Stephen Van Evera proposed the Offense-Defense theory which is basically; war will be more common in where conquest is easy and war will happen when states have large defensive or offensive opportunities. When there is conquest is when there is little resistance from an invading force, to simply resist is to deny the expansion of an invading army, and it sends the message to the opposing generals that this expansion could be dangerous. By simply having armies does not mean there will be war, armies can actually be a deterrent for war because of opposing armies having the realisation that two strong sides will negate each other out. Lying down without resisting an invading army is simply giving up your lands for free and inviting a foreign power to actually take more and more land.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Richard Flanagan - Toxic / Christos Tsiolkas - Damascus
Massive figures in Australian literature.
-
One of the very great myths of Culloden and the Scottish plight was the fact they were outgunned. This is not the case, as they had mor...
-
The War on Terror invites some great interest from a Hobbesian lens of sorts. First of all, it has nothing to do with Islam, terrorists...
-
Peter Singer, labelled one of the most controversial philosophers of his time. Many of his works discuss human rights and animal rights...
No comments:
Post a Comment